Free Vibration and Bending of Gradient Auxetic Plate Using Finite Element Method

Nội dung text: Free Vibration and Bending of Gradient Auxetic Plate Using Finite Element Method

1. VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Original Article Free Vibration and Bending of Gradient Auxetic Plate Using Finite Element Method Pham Hong Cong1,*, Vu Dinh Trung1, Do Duc Hai2, Nguyen Dinh Khoa2 1Centre for Informatics and Computing, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Hanoi, Vietnam 2VNU University of Engineering and Technology, 144 Xuan Thuy, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam Received 21 July 2021 Revised 02 August 2021; Accepted 02 August 2021 Abstract: In recent years, there has been a new approach to the material industry that uses sandwich structures with auxetic honeycomb cores with the interesting property of negative Poisson's ratios. In this paper, the Finite Element Method (in ANSYS) is used to investigate natural frequency of vibration and bending characteristics under varying pressure loads applied on the top skin when changing fundamental properties of some gradient configurations, including angular gradient, thickness gradient and functional gradient configurations of the auxetic plate with honeycomb structure. Thereby, the advantages of each configuration are investigated, studied, and obtained; therefore, it is expected to be applied in various industry sectors, such as wind turbine blades, aircraft wings, among others. Keywords: auxetic plate, gradient auxetic, free vibration and bending, Finite Element Method Nomenclature t The thickness of the wall of honeycombs E Elastic module of material l The length of the wall of honeycombs Density of material θ The inclined angle of the cells  Poisson’s ratio of material h Height of the plate hc Width of single cell L Length of the plate G Shear moduli of material h1 The thickness of top layer h2 The thickness of middle layer h3 The thickness of top layer ___ * Corresponding author. E-mail address: phcong@cic.vast.vn https//doi.org/10.25073/2588-1124/vnumap.4664 102
2. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 103 1. Introduction Auxetic materials have been applied in many fields of industry, sports, the military, aeronautics because of their special characteristics. If they are under applied tension in a direction, the dimension of perpendicular directions will be increased. This means that the Poisson's ratio of these materials (which is given by  xyyx =− / , where  x is an applied tensile strain and  y is the resulting tensile strain in the transverse direction) is negative [1]. In recent years, there have been a lot of published researches related to the auxetic material model. One of the most prominent studies is Tian and Chun [2] about wave propagation in sandwich panel with auxetic core using semi-analytical finite element method. Lira et al., [3] also published the gradient cellular core based on auxetic configurations, which could be applied in the aero-engine fan blades using the FEM combined with experimental results. The bending and failure of sandwich structures with auxetic gradient cellular cores were investigated by Y. Hou Th al. [4] using the FEM model and experimental results. In 2016, Zhang and Yang [5] published an article about numerical and experimental studies of a light-weight auxetic cellular vibration isolation base. Numerical and experimental analyses were conducted to reveal the effects of Poisson’s ratio (known as cell angle) and relative density (known as cell thickness) of the reentrant honeycombs on the dynamic performance of the novel base. A new approach to study nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite cylindrical panels with auxetic honeycomb core layer was proposed by Duc Th al. [6]. In that study, the authors used the analytical methods based on Reddy’s first order shear deformation theory (FSDT) to determine the panel’s dynamic response and natural frequency. Furthermore, there were a series of studies that applied the analytical methods of the authors Duc and Cong [7-9] to investigate the nonlinear dynamic response and vibration of sandwich composite plates, geometrically nonlinear dynamic response of eccentrically stiffened circular cylindrical shells, the dynamic response and vibration of composite double curved shallow shells. In 2019, Meena and Singamneni [10] proposed a new auxetic structure with significantly reduced stress concentration effects using the analytical method combined with experimental method. Zhang Th al. [11] used the finite element method and experiment to research the dynamic crushing of gradient auxetic honeycombs. In the same year, Cong Th al. [12] studied static bending analysis of auxetic plate by using FEM and a new third-order shear deformation plate theory. Meanwhile, some authors, such as Tomasz Strek Th al. [13] and Shammo Dutta Th al. [14] also used the FEM to study auxetic beams under bending and auxetic plate deformation under tensile loads. As can be seen from the above, none of those studies revealed that changes in gradient configurations, such as angular gradient, thickness gradient, functional gradient in the natural frequency and bending could affect the characteristics of the auxetic plate. Therefore, this work modeled three gradient configurations of auxetic core: angular gradient, thickness gradient, functional gradient and simulated the models using the FEM in ANSYS. As a result, the natural frequency and deformation of plate are obtained and the characteristics of each configuration are also remarked. 2. The Research Model and Methodology 2.1. The Research Model This work investigates three configurations of auxetic plate: Angular gradient auxetic, thickness gradient auxetic, functional gradient auxetic that are specifically described below. The common
3. 104 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 structure of three configurations of auxetic plate includes three layers: top and bottom skin layers are made of isotropic material, the internal skin or core is auxetic structure with different kinds of shape and material (Figure 1). Figure 1. Geometric parameters of a cell in honeycomb core and auxetic plate. Formulas in reference [2] are adopted to calculate honeycomb core material property: hc 33 + sin 2 tt coscosl EEEEvCCC=== ,, 1212 3 ll hhcc2 cos  ++sin sinsin sin ll hc 3 + sin 2 ttt l cos1 2sin + (1) GEGGGGCCC=== , , 121323 2 h h lll hh c c cc + sin 2cos + sin 1+ 2cos  l l ll t//2 l( h l + ) C = c , 2cos/sin(hlc + ) where symbol “c ” represents core material, EG, and are Young’s module, shear module and mass density of the origin material, respectively. 2.1.1. Angular Gradient Configurations An angular gradient (AGA) negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb structure can be obtained by changing the inclined angle of the cells n as shown in Figure 2. The cell inclined angle increases as the layer number of honeycombs increases as follows: o o o nn=30 + (n − 1)5,( 90) , (2) where n is layer number of the honeycombs. Figure 2. Angular gradient auxetic core.
4. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 105 2.1.2. Thickness Gradient Auxetic (TGA) The second configuration gradient auxetic honeycombs can be obtained by changing the wall thickness of honeycomb cells t as shown in Figure 3. The cell walls thickness increases as the number of honeycombs layers increases with the growth of honeycomb layers as follows. (3) tnn =+−0.00010.0000 2( 1) Figure 3. Thickness gradient auxetic core. 2.1.3. Functional Gradient Auxetic Functional gradient auxetic (FGA) honeycombs as shown in Figure 4 are described as follows: the top of the honeycombs is metal, and the bottom is ceramic. The materials transit continuously along from metal to ceramic along y axis, the in-plane direction of the auxetic honeycombs. Moreover, the content of ceramic along the positive direction of y axis is gradually reduced. The content of ceramic is expressed by the following volume fraction [11]: Figure 4. Functional gradient auxetic core. 2.2. Methodology In this paper, the finite element method is applied to investigate the natural frequency of the auxetic plate model. Especially, ANSYS workbench with modal module would be used to simulate this problem. The process flow chart of modal problem is shown in Figure 5.
5. 106 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Figure 5. The process flow chart of modal problem [15]. For the Modal problem, it is expressed in matrix form as [16]: MuCuKuF  ++=      . (4) In this formula, the mass M, damping C and stiffness K matrices are constant with time and the unknown nodal displacements vary with time. The finite element method approximates the real structure with a finite number of degrees of freedom. In the model with N mode shapes, the real structure is found to have N degree of freedom with the finite element method. In modal analysis of ANSYS software, the process to determine the N natural frequencies and mode shapes of the model, given initial conditions, such as boundary conditions and material properties for each part of the model. The structure model will vibrate at one of its natural frequencies and the shape of the vibration will be a scalar multiple of a mode shape, given “arbitrary” initial conditions. The resulting vibration will be a superposition of mode shapes, determines the vibration characteristics (natural frequencies and mode shapes) of a structural component. Natural frequencies and mode shapes are starting point for a transient or harmonic analysis if using the mode superposition method. a) Natural frequency analysis diagram. b) Static structural analysis diagram. Figure 6. The flow chart to solve the natural frequency and bending problem in ANSYS software.
6. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 107 Basically, the chart has 4 steps to solve the natural frequency and bending problems: Pre-prepared, preprocessed, solving process, processing results. In each step, there are small tasks or sub-steps shown in Figure 6. 3. Results and Discussion 3.1. Verification Study Example 3.1.1: In this part, a simple model of the isotropic plate is modelled and simulated in ANSYS software to examine the validity of the method in this research. A square plate with four clamped edges (side a =1) under uniform transverse pressure (F =1) , and the thickness h . The elastic module is taken as E =1 0 ,9 2 0 1, and the Poisson’s ratio is chosen as  = 0 . 3 . Figure 7. The isotropic material plate. The non-dimensional transverse displacement is set as D ww= , (5) Pl 4 where the bending stiffness D is taken as Eh3 D = 2 (6) 121( − ) Table 1. Comparison of w with the results of Ref. [12]. ah/ Mesh Ref. [12] Present 2x2 0.00357 0.0015424 6x6 0.001486 0.0014009 ah/= 10 10x10 0.001498 0.0014325 20x20 0.001503 0.0014916 30x30 0.001503 0.0014989 Table 1 shows that there is almost total agreement between the results of the present paper and the results of the study in Ref [12]. This means that the method used in this research is valid. Example 3.1.2: Considering a square plate with the edge length a =1 m, the thickness h = 0 . 0 2 m. The material of the plate is steel with these parameters: density: = 7850 kg/m3, the elastic Young’s module E = 210 11 Pa, Poisson’s ratio  = 0.3 . The square plate is clamped in 2 edges, which means: z z x x y y w0= 0,wa = 0,w 0 = 0,w a = 0,w 0 = 0,w a = 0 (7) and wwwwwwzzxxyy 000===0;0;0;0;0;0;aaa (8) zzxxyy
7. 108 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Table 2. Comparison of results of critical natural frequency and maximum deformation of the plate. Frequency (Hz) Max deformation (mm) Mode Present Ref. [12] Error Present Ref. [12] Error 1 107.65 107.9 0.24% 4.5136 4.5143 0.0066% 2 127.82 128.1 0.21% 6.8367 6.8385 0.003% 3 210.24 210.6 0.17% 7.4154 7.4719 0.053% 4 295.96 296.74 0.26% 4.5586 4.556 0.06% 5 324.26 325.11 0.259% 6.5444 6.5421 0.035% 6 384.31 384.8 0.127% 7.5434 7.548 0.06% 7 421.21 422.25 0.247% 6.8746 6.8763 0.0247% 8 578.16 579.94 0.307% 4.722 4.7202 0.038% 9 596.1 597.47 0.23% 7.2254 7.3154 0.124% 10 608.89 610.77 0.3% 6.5894 6.6952 0.16% 11 657.49 658.27 0.12% 7.3052 7.3154 0.134% 12 715.23 711.4 0.4% 6.6195 6.6124 0.1% After analyzing the process in Ansys, there is a negligible difference of about 0.4% between the data of the obtained results and that of the analyzed results in the reference article [12]. Example 3.1.3: To solve this problem, the Auxetic sandwich panel with a length of a =154 mm, another length of b = 79.3 mm and thickness h = 0.22 m; the thickness of the shell itself is t f =12 mm, horizontal ribs length l =12 mm, vertical ribs length hd = 12 mm, the angle between the horizontal ribs and the vertical ribs is  =80 degrees, is considered. A force (which is load cell) with magnitude F k= N5 is applied on the plate's centre. Three rigid rollers having 12 mm of diameter act as loading and supporting devices. Rubber pressure pads of 12 mm width are placed between the bars and specimen to prevent inner damage to the facial shell (Figure 8). The distance S=54 mm between two supporting devices is made by titanium with Young’s module E = 1.10310 11 Pa, Poisson’s ratio  = 0.34 , and density = 4430 kg/m3 [4]. Figure 8. The configuration of the simulation model.
8. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 109 Table 3. Material configuration parameters of auxetic plate. Shell (IM7/8552 carbon/epoxy Parameters Core (FDM ABSplus) unidirectional prepreg) Ex (GPa) 2.02 171 Ey (GPa) 2.02 9.08 Ez (GPa) 1.53 9.08 Gxy (GPa) 0.705 5.29 Gyz (GPa) 0.705 3.97 Gxz (GPa) 0.626 5.29  xy 0.43 0.32  yz 0.43 0.5  xz 0.43 0.32 (kg/m3) 1040 1430 With the variety of force: F1 =0.5kN, F2 =1.5kN, F3 =2kN, F4=4kN, F5=6kN applied to the simulation model, the resulted deformations of the model are presented in Table 4, Figures 9 and 10. Table 4. Comparison of the deformation results of gradient auxetic plate. Force (N) Ref. [4] Present Error 6kN 1.65 1.679 1.75% 5kN 1.38 1.3992 0.7% 4kN 1.12 1.1194 0.0536% 2kN 0.55 0.55968 1.7% 1.5k 0.42 0.419 0.23% 0.5k 0.14 0.13992 0.05%
9. 110 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Figure 9. A variety of deformations with force: F1 =0.5kN, F2 =1.5kN, F3 =2kN, F4=4kN, F5=6kN, respectively. 2 1,5 1 0,5 Article Max deformation (mm) deformation Max FEM simulation 0 Force (kN) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 10. Comparing the maximum deformations (mm) of the gradient auxetic plate. Table 4 and Figure 10 show an excellent agreement between the calculated results from the present paper and the results in the study of Ref. [4]. 3.2. Simulation Results 3.2.1. Natural Frequency of Auxetic Plate Example 3.2.1: This part presents the investigation of the thickness gradient auxetic plate made by the isotropic material: aluminium, with the thicknesses of the shell are: hh13==1 mm, the auxetic core is manufactured with honeycomb shape using aluminium, the thickness of core layer is h2 = 3 mm. The mechanical properties of aluminium: density = 2700 kg/m3, the Elastic Young’ module E = 69 GPa, Poisson’s ratio  = 0 . 3 3, the shear module G = 26 GPa. The geometric parameters of single-core cell: h = 4 mm, l = 2 mm,  = 60 , and the thicknesses of each layer's wall cells are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Parameters of each layer of auxetic core. Layer Thickness t Layer Thickness t 1st layer 0.1 mm 7th layer 0.22 mm 2nd layer 0.12 mm 8th layer 0.24 mm 3rd layer 0.14 mm 9th layer 0.26 mm 4th layer 0.16 mm 10th layer 0.28 mm 5th layer 0.18 mm 11th layer 0.30 mm 6th layer 0.2 mm
10. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 111 Appling the boundary condition CCCC to the 4 edges of the auxetic plate, the formulae of each edge are shown below: zzxxyy w0,w0,w0,w0,w0,w0000===LLL (7) zzxxyy w0,w0,w0,w0,w0,w0000===HHH and wwwzxy wwwzxy 000===0;0;0;0;0;0;LLL zzxxyy (8) wwwzxy wwwzxy 000===0;0;0;0;0;0;HHH zzxxyy After solving the formulae with simulation, we obtain: Figure 11. Shape Modes from 1 to 4 of thick auxetic plate. Frequency [Hz] 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 Frequency Frequency (Hz) 5000 0 Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Figure 12. Chart for the varieties of frequency of thick auxetic plate.
11. 112 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 490 The maximum deformation [mm] 480 470 460 450 Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Deformation Deformation (mm) Figure 13. The maximum deformation across the thickness of auxetic plate. Example 3.2.2: The angular gradient auxetic plate made of the isotropic material aluminium with the thicknesses of the plate: hh13==1 mm is considered. The auxetic core is manufactured by honeycomb shape using aluminium with the thickness of core layer h2 = 3 mm. The specifications parameters of aluminium: density = 2700 kg/m3, the Elastic Young’ module E = 69 GPa, Poisson’s ratio  = 0 . 3 3, the shear module G = 26 GPa. The geometric parameters of single core cell are: h = 4 mm, t = 0 . 1 5 mm, the length of the wall cells of each layer and the angle concave of single cell are shown in Table 6. Table 6. Parameters of each layer of angular gradient auxetic core. Parameter θ (o) l (mm) 1st layer 30 1.4 2nd layer 35 1.5 3rd layer 40 1.6 4th layer 45 1.7 5th layer 50 1.8 6th layer 55 1.9 7th layer 60 2 8th layer 65 2.1 9th layer 70 2.2 10th layer 75 2.3 11th layer 80 2.4 After the simulation process with the same boundary conditions, the deformation, natural frequency, and the shape modes of the AGA plate are shown in Figures 14 - 16. Figure 14. Shape Modes from 1 to 4 of angular auxetic plate.
12. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 113 Frequency [Hz] 50000 (Hz) Frequency Frequency 0 Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Figure 15. The frequency of Angular Auxetic plate. Max deformation [mm] 540 (mm) 520 Deformation Deformation 500 Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Figure 16. The maximum deformation of angular auxetic plate. Example 3.2.3: The dimensions of the functional gradient auxetic model are almost the same as that of gradient auxetic one except the thickness of core wall. In this model, the thickness of the core wall is a constant value t = 0 . 1 5 mm. Each layer of this model has its own mechanical properties, which are shown in Table 7. After the simulation process with the same boundary conditions, the deformation, natural frequency, and the shape modes of the AGA plate are shown in Figures 17 - 19. Table 7. Parameters of each layer of functional gradient auxetic core. Parameter Young’s module [GPa] Density [kg/m3] Poisson’s ratio 1st layer 69 2700 0.3 2nd layer 107.1 2750 0.294 3rd layer 145.2 2800 0.288 4th layer 183.3 2850 0.282 5th layer 221.4 2900 0.276 6th layer 259.5 2950 0.27 7th layer 297.6 3000 0.264 8th layer 335.7 3050 0.258 9th layer 373.8 3100 0.252 10th layer 411.9 3150 0.246 11th layer 450 3200 0.24
13. 114 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Figure 17. Shape modes from 1 to 4 of functional auxetic plate. Frequency [Hz] 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 Frequency Frequency (Hz) Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Frequency [Hz] Figure 18. The frequency of functional auxetic plate. Varieties of the maximum deformation of Functional Auxetic plate 520 500 480 460 Mode 1 Mode 2 Mode 3 Mode 4 Deformation Deformation (mm) Series1 Figure 19. The maximum deformation of functional auxetic plate. 3.2.2. Bending of Auxetic Plate Example 3.2.4: Using the same model as Section 3.2.1 with its mechanical properties remained unchanged, the applied boundary condition to the model is clamped for four edges of the plate. When the external force is applied, the outer surface of top shell is under pressure of magnitude 1000 Pa. After exporting the deformation of the plate, we obtain the results below:
14. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 115 Figure 20. The deformation in centerline of auxetic plate. TGA 1,00E-02 8,00E-03 6,00E-03 4,00E-03 2,00E-03 0,00E+00 Deformation Deformation (mm) TGA Figure 21. The deformation (mm) in the middle line of the TGA plate. Example 3.2.5: With the same model of angular gradient auxetic as Section 3.2.1, a pressure with the magnitude of 1000 Pa is applied on the top surface of the auxetic plate. The obtained deformation results are shown in Figures 22 and 23: Figure 22. Deformation of AGA.
15. 116 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Figure 23. The deformation (mm) in the center line of the AGA plate. Example 3.2.6: With the same model of angular gradient auxetic as Section 3.2.1, a pressure with the magnitude of 1000 Pa is applied on the top surface of the auxetic plate. The obtained deformation results are shown in the figures below: FGA 6,00E-03 5,00E-03 4,00E-03 3,00E-03 2,00E-03 1,00E-03 0,00E+00 Deformation (mm) Deformation FGA Figure 24. The deformation (mm) in the center line of the FGA plate. Table 8. Varieties of the applied pressure magnitude of gradient auxetic and maximum deformation (mm), Gradient Auxetic AGA TGA FGA Configurations 500N 0.0036911 0.0039596 0.0028182 1000N 0.0073822 0.0079192 0.0056364 1500N 0.011073 0.011879 0.0084547 2000N 0.014764 0.015838 0.011273 2500N 0.018456 0.019798 0.014091
16. P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 117 0,025 0,02 0,015 0,01 AGA Deformation (mm) Deformation 0,005 AGA2 AGA3 0 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Force (N) Figure 25. Deformation of gradient auxetic plates under different pressure values. Comparing the deformation of points in the middle line of the plate with xa= /2 and yb=→0 . Figure 26. Curves of the deformation of points along the middle line of three types of auxetic gradient plate. From the figures above, the deformation lines separated by the middle line went into two different directions. This is due to the changing of different material properties, such as the angle of core, the thickness, and elastic Young's module. In practical applications, this characteristic can be utilized for manufacturing purposes, such as producing the blade of an electric turbine, aeroplane wing, etc. needed to be resistant under changing working conditions. 4. Conclusion This paper investigates the natural frequency and bending of the plate under various auxetic configurations with negative Poisson’s ratio. By applying the finite element method with estimated simulation then comparing the results to published articles, this work is proven valid. The natural frequencies of four-shape mode and its maximum deformation of three types of configurations of the auxetic plate are explicitly indicated. The acquired results have practical meaning for industrial manufacturing since they can be applied in producing aircraft wings and other productions. In addition, this work solves the bending problem of three types of gradient configurations of the auxetic plate under various pressure values. The variability of deformation characteristics along the gradient direction could lead to many potential applications in the material industry in the future.
17. 118 P. H. Cong et al. / VNU Journal of Science: Mathematics – Physics, Vol. 37, No. 4 (2021) 102-118 Acknowledgments This research was funded by Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology under Grant VAST01.02/21-22. References [1] K. E. Evans, M. Nkansah, I. J. Hutchison, S. C. Rogers, Molecular Network Design, Nature, Vol. 353, No. 124, 1991, pp. 124-125, [2] D. Q. Tian, Y. Z. Chun, Wave Propagation in Sandwich Panel with Auxetic Core, Journal of Solid Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2010, pp. 393-402. [3] C. Lira, F. Scarpa, R. Rajasekaran, A Gradient Cellular Core for Aeroengine Fan Blades Based on Auxetic Configurations, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Vol. 22, 2011, [4] Y. Hou, Y. H. Tai, C. Lira, F. Scarpa, J. R. Yates, B. Gu, The Bending and Failure of Sandwich Structures with Auxetic Gradient Cellular Cores, Composites: Part A, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 119-131, [5] X. W. Zhang, D. Q. Yang, Numerical and Experimental Studies of a Light - Weight Auxetic Cellular Vibration Isolation Base, 2016, pp. 1-16, [6] N. D. Duc, S. E. Kim, N. D. Tuan, T. Phuong, N. D. Khoa, New Approach to Study Nonlinear Dynamic Response and Vibration of Sandwich Composite Cylindrical Panels with Auxetic Honeycomb Core Layer, Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 70, 2017, pp. 396-404, [7] N. D. Duc, P. H. Cong, Nonlinear Dynamic Response and Vibration of Sandwich Composite Plates with Negative Poisson’s Ratio in Auxetic Honeycombs, Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2018, pp. 692-717, [8] P. H. Cong, P. T. Long, N. V. Nhat, N. D. Duc, Geometrically Nonlinear Dynamic Response of Eccentrically Stiffened Circular Cylindrical Shells with Negative Poisson’s Ratio in Auxetic Honeycombs Core Layer, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 152, 2019, pp. 443-453, [9] N. D. Duc, K. S. Eock, P. H. Cong, N. T. Anh, N. D. Khoa, Dynamic Response and Vibration of Composite Double Curved Shallow Shells with Negative Poisson’s Ratio in Auxetic Honeycombs Core Layer on Elastic Foundations Subjected to Blast and Damping Loads, International Journal of Mechanical of Sciences, Vol. 133, 2017, pp. 504-512, [10] K. Meena, S. Singamneni, A New Auxetic Structure with Significantly Reduced Stress Concentration Effects, Materials and Design, Vol. 173, 2019, pp. 107779, [11] J. Zhang, B. Dong, W. Zhang, Dynamic Crushing of Gradient Auxetic Honeycombs, Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, Vol. 11, 2020, [12] P. H. Cong, P. M. Phuc, H. T. Thiem, D. T. Manh, N. D. Duc, Static Bending Analysis of Auxetic Plate by FEM and a New Third-order Shear Deformation Plate Theory, VNU Journal of Science: Natural Sciences and Technology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2020, pp. 90-99, [13] T. Strek, B. Maruszewski, J. W. Narojczyk, K. W. Wojciechowski, Finite Element Analysis of Auxetic Plate Deformation, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, Vol. 354, 2008, pp. 4475-4480, [14] S. Dutta, H. G. Menon, M. P. Hariprasad, A. Krishnan, B. Shankar, Study of Auxetic Beams under Bending: A Finite Element Approach, Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020, [15] M. Abid, S. Maqsood, H. A. Wajid, Comparative Modal Analysis of Gasketed and Nongasketed Bolted Flamged Pipe Joints: FEA Approach, Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2012, [16] D. W. Herrin, Slides to Accompany Lectures in Vibro-Acoustic Design in Mechanical Systems 2012, KY 40506-0503.